Email this page to a friend
Search
tools & resources
Articles & Information: Results of the 2001 Client Survey

Current Trends In
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MARKETING
Benchmarking Survey 1996 - 2001
December 2001

View the Survey

Introduction
In 1995, Professional Services Marketing conducted its first wave of research with Twin Cities-based professional services firms. Our research goal was to determine how these firms were marketing their services and how they were staffing and funding their marketing functions. The feedback we received provided a rich source of trend and benchmarking information for the survey we completed in 2001.

In October 2001 we repeated the survey to compare and contrast how services firms are marketing today, and to explore the changes that have taken place in professional services marketing over the past five years.

We identified a number of interesting trends, including the continued trend to outsource various marketing activities, and the fact that in spite of a tighter economy, the vast majority of participants plan to maintain or increase their focus on marketing in 2002. A summary and analysis of the survey results follows.

The Research Question
Is there a trend among professional services organizations to outsource all or part of the internal marketing function, and how has that changed over the past five years since this survey was originally conducted?

The Results: An Overview
We learned that there is still a very strong interest in outsourcing all or part of a firm’s marketing function. When we first conducted this survey in 1996, 56% of respondents indicated that, if proven cost effective, they would be interested in outsourcing all of part of their marketing function. Five years later, 59% of respondents answered yes to the same question.

Those who responded to the survey were primarily president/CEO level professionals (43%). Other who responded included marketing executives (24%), practicing professionals (19%) and firm administrators (14%). Responses were received from firms in the following industries: legal, business consulting, accounting, financial, HR consulting, insurance, and architectural.

In addition, it is interesting to note that an in additional question added to the 2001 survey, asking how the tighter economy will affect firms’ marketing initiatives in 2002, 95% of respondents indicated that they will either maintain the same level of marketing or increase their emphasis on marketing, while only 5% indicated that they plan to reduce spending on marketing initiatives. Finally, it is also interesting to note that 87% of respondents indicate that they have a Website – evidence of the importance many firms place on online marketing.

Professionals in the following industries completed the survey:
48% Legal
17% Business Consulting
13% Accounting
13% Other: Financial, HR Consulting, Insurance
9% Architectural

The following reflects the position level of the respondents:
43% Managing Partner or President/CEO
24% Marketing Vice President or Director
19% Practicing Professional (lawyer, architect, accountant, engineer, etc.)
14% Firm Administrator

Size of respondents' firms:
42% 1 -10
38% 11-50
4% 51-100
8% 101-150
4% 151-200
4% 200+

Those services outsourced in 2001 by 20% or more of respondents include:
  2001 1996
Advertising (Print, Radio, TV, Cable, Web) 35% 32%
Public and Media Relations 41% 38%
Firm Identity Materials 37% 31%
Marketing Coaching for Individual Professionals 29% 14%
Firm Brochures and Capabilities Pieces 29% 37%
Seminar and Event Invitations 24% 21%
Internet Website Planning, Development and Marketing 22% 16%

Services which may be pursued in 2002 include:
Client satisfaction program development 40%  
Marketing training for professionals 35%  
Marketing training for staff 38%  
Competitive Market Research 20%  
Website planning, development and Marketing 17%  
RFP Responses and Proposal Development 16%  
Cross-Marketing Program Development 15%  
Seminar and Special Event Planning 14%  
Referral Program Development 13%  
Marketing Database development 13%  

PROJECT SIGNIFICANCE

High level of interest
This project is significant because it demonstrates that the interest level in outsourcing all or part of the marketing function has not wavered in four years; in fact, it has increased. In 1996, 56% of respondents answered ‘yes’ to the research question, and in 2001, 59% of respondents answered ‘yes.’ The services for which firms have used outsourced marketing professionals in the last year are similar in the 1996 and 2001 surveys as well, with the top areas being public and media relations, advertising, and firm brochures and capabilities pieces.

Criteria upon which marketing consultants are hired
Another significant result of the survey is the analysis of the criteria upon which professional services firms evaluate outside marketing services providers. The 1996 survey validated the author’s hypothesis that experience and professional services marketing expertise would be the overriding factors when selecting outside marketing counsel. While it is still very high on the list (second), creativity has risen two levels to number one. It is the author’s hypothesis that the competition among professional services firms gets stronger each year, and firms are looking for outside marketing professionals who can definitively set their firm apart from the crowd. In order to achieve this, creativity, in addition to experience and expertise in professional services marketing, is paramount.

In order of importance, respondents selected the following criteria most important. Percentages reflect “Extremely important” responses:

  • Creativity (96%)
  • Demonstrated expertise in professional services marketing (95%)
  • Specific knowledge of client's industry (92%)
  • Ability to work as a team with in-house marketing staff (91%)
  • Excellent written and verbal communications skills (91%)
  • Fast turn-around time (65%)
  • Location - Twin Cities Based (50%)
  • Understanding and use of technology (46%)
  • Low cost (41%)
  • Impressive portfolio and client references (36%)
  • One-stop shop; the ability to handle many different projects (27%)

Survey respondents rated the importance of a comprehensive list of consultant characteristics on a scale of 1-10, identifying them as extremely important, somewhat important, important, and not important. Responses are below:

Demonstrated expertise in professional services marketing
95% Extremely Important
5% Somewhat Important
 
Fast Turn-around time on work
65% Extremely Important
27% Somewhat Important
8% Important
 
Ability to handle many different projects - the "one-stop-shop"
27% Extremely Important
59% Somewhat Important
5% Important
9% Not Important
 
Specific knowledge of your industry
92% Extremely Important
8% Somewhat Important
 
Ability to work as a team with your current in-house marketing staff
91% Extremely Important
9% Not Important
 
Understanding and use of technology
46% Extremely Important
45% Somewhat Important
9% Important
 
Low cost
41% Extremely Important
45% Somewhat Important
13% Important
 
Location: Twin Cities-based
50% Extremely Important
32% Somewhat Important
9% Important
9% Not Important
 
Creativity
96% Extremely Important
4% Somewhat Important
 
Impressive portfolio and client references
36% Extremely Important
64% Somewhat Important
 
Excellence in written and verbal communications
91% Extremely Important
9% Somewhat Important

Similar to the 1996 survey, 84% of respondents are in firms with under 100 billing professionals. Approximately 12% of respondents are in firms with 101-200 professionals, and only 4% are in firms with over 200 professionals.

The following demonstrates the amount of gross revenue participating firms allocate toward marketing:
41% 0-2% of gross revenue
41% 3-4% of gross revenue
18% 5-6% of gross revenue

The following reflects how firms have adjusted their marketing budget over the past year:
82% Increased
18% Decreased

Many participating firms indicate that they do have a website.
87% Yes
13% No

The following reflects the existence of internal marketing departments in respondent firms:
  2001 1996
No 57% 38%
Yes 42% 62%

Unlike the 1996 survey in which only 38% of respondents indicated that they did not have an internal marketing staff, the 2001 survey indicates that the majority of respondents do not staff an internal marketing staff (57%). It was surprising to the author that such a significant percentage of respondents have no in-house marketing staff. With the large number of marketing initiatives being handled in-house, it is unclear to what other internal departments the marketing tasks currently fall.

Those firms with internal marketing departments report the following in terms of the number of staff:
  2001 1996
1 person 50% 30%
Over 5 people 30% 23%
2-4 people 20% 47%

On the following chart, respondents identified the marketing services currently performed in-house, services contracted for during the past year, and services they may choose to pursue in the future.

MARKETING SERVICE Handled
In-House
%
Contracted
for Service
During
%
May Choose to Pursue in 2002 and Beyond
%
  2001 1996 2001 1996 2001
Strategic Marketing Planning          
Firm-Wide Strategic Marketing Planning and Positioning 74 79 17 17 9
Practice or Industry Group Marketing 71 71 19 11 10
Regional Office Marketing 80 47 10 4 10
Marketing Coaching for Individual Professionals 41 79 29 11 29
Cross-Marketing Program Development 85 55 5 15
Referral Program Development 88 58 5 13
Trade and Professional Association Marketing Program Development 76 67 12 5 12
Client Satisfaction Program Development 47 54 13 11 40
           
Name Recognition And Awareness          
Advertising (Print, Radio, TV, Cable, Web) 55 56 35 32 10
Public and Media Relations 47 55 41 38 12
Underwriting/Sponsorships 75 NA 17 NA 8
           
Strategic Communications          
Client Communications 81 85 9 18 9
Employee Communications 93 83 7 5 0
RFP Responses and Proposal Development 74 80 11 NA 16
Seminar and Special Event Planning 77 76 9 13 14
           
Marketing Technologies          
Internet Website Planning, Development and Marketing 61 57 22 16 17
Marketing Database Development 70 80 17 7 13
           
Marketing Materials Development          
Firm Identity Materials (letterhead, business cards, etc.) 62 NA 31 NA 8
Newsletters 88 71 16 12
Firm Brochures and Capabilities Pieces 62 72 29 37 9
Seminar and Event Invitations 67 70 24 21 9
           
Marketing Information          
Competitive Market Research 73 47 6 16 20
Industry Research 73 NA 13 NA 13
           
Marketing And Client Service Training          
For Professionals 47 46 18 36 35
Staff Level 62 43 24 38

If proven cost-effective, the following percentages of respondents would consider outsourcing all or part of their firms' marketing function to an outside marketing services provider?

  2001 1996
Yes 59% 56%
No 41% 44%

This question directly addresses the research question: Is there a trend among professional services organizations to outsource all or part of the internal marketing function? The answer is yes. In fact, the number of those who are interested in outsourcing marketing services is slowly, but surely, on the rise.

Why or why not?

33% Have unique business or business model that does not lend itself to outsourcing their marketing function
25% Would be willing to outsource if it could be proven to be cost effective
17% Say their in-house marketing function is well-received and adequate
17% Say it is not cost effective
8% Indicate the outside perspective outsourcing could provide would be valuable

It is interesting that the area in which there was a great increase between 1996 and 2001 in the number of firms who have outsourced services in the last year, is that of strategic planning. This is very pleasing to the author, who is a strong advocate of developing a long-term strategic plan prior to launching individual initiatives that may or may not support the overall goals and objectives of the firm.

Those who have outsourced all or part of their marketing function report the following levels of satisfaction:

31% Very satisfied
23% Extremely satisfied
23% Satisfied
15% Somewhat satisfied
7% Not at all satisfied

Respondents identified the following as the strongest contributing factors to their levels of satisfaction:

45% Quality of work
15% Cost
15% Communication skills of professionals
15% Services offered by professionals
10% Other

© 2008 Professional Services Marketing, Inc.